It was only recently that I saw the much talked about exchange of opinions in the Facebook note posted by Manila Collegian’s editor-in-chief. The note in question is his response to the allegations that MKule showed partiality by publishing an article in the absence of an official document. The editor-in-chief assures that all of MKule’s endeavors are anchored on the interest of the students. However, after going through the statement and the comments that accompanied it, I only felt more intimidated than grateful.
As an organizational communication student, I was taught to respond to crisis as civilly as possible. I also learned not to treat detractors as enemies but challengers. Negative feedback must be viewed as thoughts to ponder about not as offense. In making clarifications, the defender must not attempt to attack the other party. It will only make the defense appear/sound antagonistic.
Ad hominem is disappointing. It never really clarifies anything. As for the issue at hand, I believe that an official document must accompany or be cited in the article. Constitutional crises such as the supposed suspension of a student leader need sufficient veracity (preferably in the form of tangible evidence) especially since such crises affect the behavior and perception of a community (which in this case is UP Manila).
Nevertheless, I appreciate the editor-in-chief’s efforts to shed light on the matter. I also appreciate his transparency as an editor-in-chief. I share the same belief that “the truth is mighty and it shall prevail”. I hope the issue clears up soon.
